B. Choose the correct option. 1) She DON’T HAVE TO / DOESN’T HAVE TO / MUST wash the dishes now. I’ll do it later.

2) My brother HAVE TO / HAS TO / DOESN’T HAVE TO wear a tie at his work. He is a lawyer.

3) You MUSTN’T / MUST smoke in public places. It’s prohibited.

4) We have a meeting with our boss tomorrow at 9 am. We MUSTN’T / DON’T HAVE TO be late.

5) I HAVE TO / MUST / DON’T HAVE TO tidy my room today because I cleaned it yesterday.

6) We MUSTN’T / DON’T HAVE TO forget to set the alarms before we leave our house.

7) We MUST / DON’T HAVE TO bring our passports or we won’t board the plane.

8) You MUSTN’T / DON’T HAVE TO / HAVE TO drink and drive.

9) Sarah comes to the party because she DOESN’T HAVE TO / HAS TO / HAVE TO work tomorrow.

she doesn't have to wash the dishes now I'll do it later.

i don't have enough information to answer with a sure choice but these are the two answers that could answer your question:

impossible to solve.

incapable of being dissolved.

hope this ! =^-^=

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.