subject
English, 11.12.2020 03:20 2018jecr46871

During a discussion on voting rights, one of your classmates says, “I do not think convicted felons should be given the right to vote. They have not shown themselves to be reliable or productive members of society, so they should not get a say in how our government runs.” Which of these would be the best question to ask if you wanted to clarify this idea?

a) Are you saying that you do not think convicted felons should be given the right to vote at all or just when they are in prison?
b) How could you say that you do not think convicted felons should be given the right to vote even after they have served their time?
c) Why do you think convicted felons should not be allowed to vote if they were able to vote before they committed a crime?
d) Are you willing to consider other opinions about convicted felons being given the right to vote after they have served their time?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:00
Read the excerpt from the strange case of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde. from that time forward, mr. utterson began to haunt the door in the by-street of shops. in the morning before office hours, at noon when business was plenty, and time scarce, at night under the face of the fogged city moon, by all lights and at all hours of solitude or concourse, the lawyer was to be found on his chosen post. "if he be mr. hyde,” he had thought, "i shall be mr. seek.” how is mr. utterson characterized in the excerpt? as mysterious as depressed as determined as generous
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
The author most likely uses the word monstrous rather than the word “unpleasant” because it has a more positive connotation than the word “unpleasant.” a more negative connotation than the word “unpleasant.” a more neutral connotation than the word “unpleasant.” almost the same connotation as the word “unpleasant.”
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:50
Can someone me with this english question
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
During a discussion on voting rights, one of your classmates says, “I do not think convicted felons...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2021 08:10
question
Chemistry, 18.10.2021 08:10
question
Physics, 18.10.2021 08:10
question
English, 18.10.2021 08:10
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2021 08:10
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2021 08:10
Questions on the website: 13722363