subject
English, 08.10.2019 11:30 bluenblonderw

Which sentence properly combines these two sentences through the use of an appositive? the head chef is an expert in chinese cuisine. she took me on a tour of the kitchen.
a. the head chef took me on a tour of the kitchen; her expertise is in chinese cuisine.
b. the head chef took me on a tour of the kitchen, and her expertise is in chinese cuisine.
c. the head chef, an expert in chinese cuisine, took me on a tour of the kitchen.
d. the head chef who took me on a tour is an expert in chinese cuisine.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 17:30
How are the themes from roosevelt's introduction to his address and the excerpt from king's letter similar? click here to read "letter from a birmingham jail."
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Will give if correct read the passage first of all, if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that [it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest, but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norgay gazed down upon the world from its summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
Read the excerpt from act 3 of a doll’s house. mrs. linde: you seemed to me to imply that with me you might have been quite another man. krogstad: i am certain of it. mrs. linde: is it too late now? krogstad: christine, are you saying this deliberately? yes, i am sure you are. i see it in your face. have you really the courage, then—? mrs. linde: i want to be a mother to someone, and your children need a mother. we two need each other. nils, i have faith in your real character—i can dare anything together with you. krogstad [grasps her hands]. , , christine! now i shall find a way to clear myself in the eyes of the world. ah, but i forgot— how does the conflict in this passage develop a theme? mrs. linde creates a conflict by promising something she cannot give to krogstad, which develops the theme that empty promises can destroy relationships. krogstad continues the conflict by choosing clearing his name over having a life with mrs. linde, which develops the theme that you must often choose yourself over others. krogstad creates a conflict by deceiving mrs. linde about his intentions, which develops the theme that, in love, actions speak louder than words. mrs. linde resolves the conflict by committing to a new life with krogstad, which develops the theme that new beginnings are always possible.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which characteristic of james baldwin’s “notes of a native son” qualify as a work of literary nonfiction
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which sentence properly combines these two sentences through the use of an appositive? the head che...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.09.2019 18:10
Questions on the website: 13722361