When you analyze a prompt and determine that it is argumentative, you must write two possible claims. These claims should argue opposite sides. The reason why you
write two possible claims is that one will become your claim and one will become
your counterclaim. These two sentences, your claim and possible counterclaim, help
you to focus on what text evidence you are to search for when you are reading your
three sources. This way you can highlight text evidence that supports your claim and
counterclaim.
True
False

What is the best way to combine these sentences?

Start writing a narrative by summarizing thebeginning, middle, and end in the spacesprovided. for this step, tell the events in the orderthey actually happened. use past tense. i get really bad writer's block,

Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.