HELP MEE PLS 3 SENTENCES MIN
Compare Sarah Palin's view of government involvement in addressing obesity issues with Congressman Tim Huelskamp's view. Use supporting evidence from the lesson to support your comparison. Your response should be a minimum of three complete sentences.

Compare Sarah Palin's view of government involvement in addressing obesity issues with Congressman Tim Huelskamp's view.

I believe that both of their views are very different and have different targets, on one hand we have Sarah Palin who thinks that the government should not get involved with what kids are eating at all when she directly attacks the“Let's Move” initiative. On the other we have Tim Huelskamp who does not agree with having to limit the amount of calories that kids eat at school. I believe that Tim’s view is right since every kid is different and I really don't think that limiting the amount of food they consume is the right way to handle the obesity problem.

Explanation:

b) sending meeting reports

hope this

if you want you can give me brainiliest i need 3 more but your choice

                  ~jayden

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.