Do you think it is important for people to believe in legends like King Arthur even if there is little evidence to support them? Why or why not? Write a short (3 paragraphs) explanatory essay stating your opinion. Justify your opinion and conclusions with relevant textual evidence (quotes or paraphrased ideas from sources) and background knowledge. Remember to use relevant vocabulary from the text in your essay.

the answers are:

1. dolores driscoll - b. first person minor

dolores is a minor character who happens to be driving the bus at the time of the accident. she narrates picking up each of the children and her last memory is the children being thrown around the bus.

2. billy ansel - a. first person major

billy loses his twins in the accident. he tells his own story, how he witnessed the accident and how he tried to the rescuers. he is a major character, as he is at the center of the story.

3. mitchell stephens - c. first person observer

mitchell enters the story after the accident. he is a lawyer who learns about the accident based on other characters observations. though he tells the story from a first person perspective, he is just an observer.

as for matcthing the message or lesson posted with the person who said them:

1."obviously, you can't control everything, but you are obliged to take care of the few things you can. i'm an optimist basically who acts like a pessimist. on principle. just in case." - dolores driscoll

2. "i could no longer believe even in life. . for me now the only reality was death." - billy ansel

the underlined phrase is an example of : understatment

the opening scene of "sweat" exposes the great emotional charge of the story. it shows the violence and abuse that dyes the marriage between delia jones and skyes.

skyes decides to terrorize his wife by pulling a bull whip (which resembles a snake), knowing that she is terrified of those animals. skyes laughs cruelly at her and kicks the laundry with which delia has been working hard, telling her to get rid of it. skyes also comments on her religious manners, telling his wife how ridiculous they are. delia reacts by threatening skyes with her frying pan, generating even more conflict

all languages change over time, and there can be many different reasons for this. the english language is no different – but why has it changed over the decades? some of the main influences on the evolution of languages include : -the movement of people across countries and continents, for example migration and, in previous centuries, colonization. for example, english speakers today would probably be comfortable using the spanish word “loco” to describe someone who is “crazy”. -speakers of one language coming into contact with those who speak a different one. no two individuals speak identically: people from different geographical places clearly speak differently and even within the same community there are variations according to a speaker’s age, gender, ethnicity and social and educational background. for example, the word “courting” has become “dating”. -new vocabulary required for inventions such as transport, domestic appliances and industrial equipment, or for sporting, entertainment, cultural and leisure reasons. for example, the original late 19th-century term “wireless” has become today’s “radio”. due to these influences, a language always embraces new words, expressions and pronunciations as people come across new words and phrases in their day-to-day lives and integrate them into their own speech.

    as the english language has changed, it’s been easy to pick out words that pass into common usage. here at pearson english, we have explored some of these recent changes to the english language. the rise in popularity of internet slang has seen phrases such as “lol” (laugh out loud), “yolo” (you only live once) and “bae” (an abbreviated form of babe or baby) become firmly embedded in the english language over the past ten years. sentence structure is of course another change to english language. decades ago, it would have been normal to ask “have you a moment” now, you might say “do’ you have a sec” similarly, “how do you do” has become “how’s it going” not only have the sentences been abbreviated, but new words have been introduced to everyday questions connected to this is the replacement of certain words with other, more-modern versions. it’s pretty noticeable that words like “shall” and “ought” are on the way out, but “will”, “should” and “can” are doing just fine.

as with everything, change isn’t necessarily a bad thing and, as the needs of english language users continue to change, so will the language!