1. Which part of the position paper you "refute" the counterclaim? a) Introduction
b) Conclusion
c) body
d) none of these

2. Which of the following statements is false?
a) A position statement can be based upon your personal opinion
b) You will need to pick a side when writing a position statement
c) You don't need to offer any alternatives when writing a position statement
d) You should always write a conclusion that sums up your stance on the topic

3. It refers to the intellectual process of demonstrating truth or falsehood by presenting reasons and evidences to support
a) a claim.
b) b) Introduction
c) c) conclusion
d) d) argumentation
4. It is your position about an issue.
a) topic
b) claim
c) argument
d) none of these

5. What is not true about position paper?
a) It presents a writer’s stand on a particular issue.
b) It entails outlining arguments and proposing the course of action.
c) It is an essential tool in bringing about societal change.
d) All of these
e) None of these

6. Writing position paper is an essential tool in bringing about societal change.
a) True b) false

7. Only one argument should be present in a position paper.
a) true b) false

8. It is alright to write position paper without evidence(s).
a) true b) false

9. To have a more persuasive position paper, you have to conduct audience analysis.
a) true b) false

10. It is your position about an issue.
a) research
b) argument
c) claim
d) none of these

It would be faster for a human resource manager to use a blank to alert employees about a company picnic

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

What does the duke reveal about himself to the reader as he speaks in “my last duchess” by robert browning? that he is a believer in romantic love that he is a calculating villain that he is a trustworthy husband that he is a sophisticated man worthy of respect