In your opinion, why did Martin Luther King, Jr. discourage people from fighting discrimination with violence? Is violence an effective means to create change? Why or why not? Use evidence from the speech and other examples from history in your answer.

Explanation:

As a theologian, Martin Luther King reflected often on his understanding of nonviolence. He described his own “pilgrimage to nonviolence” in his first book, Stride Toward Freedom, and in subsequent books and articles. “True pacifism,” or “nonviolent resistance,” King wrote, is “a courageous confrontation of evil by the power of love”. Both “morally and practically” committed to nonviolence, King believed that “the Christian doctrine of love operating through the Gandhian method of nonviolence was one of the most potent weapons available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom”

many scientists' predictions of climate change include: warmer temperatures, rising sea levels, and more frequent storms.

that is the wrong

answer: the prince warns the 2 families that if they get into another fight they will be put to death