2 An unshelled fish is lively and elusive past the power of words to portray, and in this undoubtedly, lies its desirability, People will travel for two nights and a day to some spot where all unshelled fish has once been seen, taking $59.99 worth of
fishing tackle, 'marked down from $60.00 for to-day only," rent a canoe, hire a guide at more than human life is worth in
courts of law, and work with dogged patience from gray dawn till sunset. And for what? For one small bass which could have
been bought at any trustworthy market for sixty-five cents, or, possibly, some poor little kitten-fish-offspring of a
catfish-whose mother's milk is not yet dry upon its lips.
Why does the author say in paragraph 2 that the baby catfish (which she calls a "kitten-fish) has mother's milk not yet dry upon its
Lips, when fish don't really drink milk at all?
A:
A)
The author is joking about how young the catfish is.
B)
The author is presenting a little known fact about catfish.
The author has her facts wrong and thinks fish nurse like baby mammals,
D)
The author is trying to see if the reader knows the truth about catfish.
I

heritage? culture? religion? gene? trait?

now you can make him brainleist.              

yes it did. that's been proven time and again. i used to be an elementary school teacher myself, and i worked with thousands of kids with cerebral palsy across the nation and in canada. what i observed was that children with dyslexia were struggling to read and learn. it was a serious issue that impacted teachers all over the country, but it was so often ignored and denied.

and children with disabilities – children who have learning disabilities – they got to spend a lot of time reading in a classroom.

i could not believe there was never any kind of conversation in my school about how to provide more opportunities for students with disabilities. the education system was still looking for ways to keep the pressure on children's teachers to improve their grades, that they have to be teachers who were in the grade for eight years, and they weren't even being evaluated.

so why weren't parents or guardians concerned about whether their kids were being by this system, if they could not see their kids in a classroom that they could improve? why couldn't you say, "i think you need to improve your reading skills," right? and they certainly believed it when i pointed it out to them. it doesn't matter if you said, "you need to go to an optometry class, or to a teacher's camp

the correct answer is 4) infinitive phrase with a direct object

the explanation is that the infinitive phrase, "to with the younger children", functions as the object. it means the thing that the subject does.

1) no infinitive is incorrect because there is an infinitive verb in the sentence.

2) an infinitive only is incorrect because it is not in isollation. it is part of an infinitive phrase.

3) infinitive phrase with a subject is incorrect because in this example the infinitive phrase does not function as the subject doing the action of the sentence.