Why might it be important to look at both personal experiences AND data when researching a topic for an argument?

Important to look at both personal experiences and data when researching a topic for an argument is described below in detail.

Explanation:

Sometimes the safest evidence for your argument is a solid fact or visible illustration of a fact. This kind of evidence can be a reliable spine for your argument, but you still require to produce a context for your user and describe the relationships you desire him or her to make. It supervises the intent of their writing and discovers how complicated or how mild the piece should be.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

a. the scene is structured as a dialogue between two characters in their own informal language.