Read this sentence from the speech. In essence, what introducing the unpredictable grizzly bear
under the full protection of the Endangered Species Act
means is that this large area that we see blocked in this map
will experience a complete change in its lifestyle.
Which of these statements explains why the speaker's conclusion
could be considered invalid?
The speaker draws the audience's attention away from the real issues.
The speaker cites information that is not consistent with her main
ideas.
The speaker makes a sweeping generalization that may or may not be
true.
The speaker includes information that supports the wildlife officials'
position. HELP PLEASE ASAP