How are Moldanado's and Amy Rushman's attitudes different toward beauty competitions for children?

Moldanado believes that beauty competitions for children are part of American culture and are beneficial for girls. Rushman believes that these competitions are harmful to girls.

Explanation:

Moldanado and Rushman present two opposing points about running a beauty contest for children. Rushman says that these contests are harmful, stimulate rivalry between girls, prevent them from having a normal childhood, and stimulate the existence of problems of self-esteem that can develop and become bigger problems. Moldanado, on the other hand, says that these contests are beneficial, as they help girls to be disciplined and to get used to the victories and defeats of the competitive world in which we live, in addition to being a part of American culture.

there is no texting, but on the homepage there are a bunch of questions you can answer along with the subjects so you can pick a specific one

hope this !

-payshence

based on the biblical principle philippians 4: 13 "i can do everything through christ who strengthens me." i agree that it is through him that we are given the strength to cope with every situation.

and based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32 "better to get angry slowly than to be a hero. better to be even-tempered than to capture a city."   i agree with the author of the passage to the extent that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are contemptuous, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and make sure to not hurt other people and their feelings are strong people.