Look at the “Why Say Yes / Why Say No” section of the article. Consider which side you agree more with. Were there other details in the article that could be considered pros and cons? Identify one more pro and one con from the rest of the article and add each to the list. Which side do you think is more persuasive? Explain your position. Your answer should be one paragraph. Submit your response in the box below. (ALSO I DIDN'T GET ANY "rest of the article" STUFF)

Can you put the picture of the article

Explanation:

So we can answer it bc I don’t have any idea of what article u are talking about :)

I think that the no side was more persuasive. It has been proven that GMO's could cause allergic responses and can could cause undesired toxicity. GMO's could also cause side affects like toxicity, organ damage and gene transfer. Organic or uncontaminated, pesticide free fruit do not have any fertilizers solvents or additives. In the article the no side said rot free tomatoes are no longer being engineered because they started containing carcinogens, a cancer causing substance. This is why I say no to GMO.

this is mine!

i don't know sorry i cannot read a novel in 30 min.

explanation:

but just in case i think the answer is b.

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.