How do the underlined sentences on pages 1-2 advance the author's point of view?
They support the idea that people drink bottled
water based on quality concerns rather than on
cost or environmental concerns.
They support the idea that people should be
concerned about the effects of bottled water
production on the environment.
They show that people who do not have access to
safe water must pay for bottled water, at great cost
to the environment.
They show that people who have little regard for
the environment are willing to spend money on
high-quality bottled water.
Look

why? ? and you will probably get ban

explanation:

yes a mod can probably ban you, and will if you continue to spam. i don't know why you would want to be ban.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

i am a strong (insert gender here) my father and his brother were to, they were killed not by the cold, not by the bears or wolves that roam our streets at night, but by the   bolsheviks. we must stand up and fight communism or we all end up dead, starved dehydrated, enslaved. the time is now we must fight. lenin is a dangerous man but he can be stopped. so my comrades we shall siege there weapons tonight on ward. (rides away with ak(not invented yet) and sword in hand while on bear into snowstorm)