What best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work? •The relationship between the examples and the conclusion would be unclear and hard to understand.
•The relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow.
•The relationship between the claim, reasons, and evidence would be too vague and wouldn't make sense.
•The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

•The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

Explanation:

Without transitions the argument will be unorganized. The reader will need to know how to follow along in a argument.

<3

type of error:

the error in the sentence is a "dangling modifier". a dangling modifier is a phrase, word or clause that "dangles" because there is not target to modify. in this case, "after mopping the floor" is the dangling modifier since it has no word to modify. the noun "house" cannot mop the floor; therefore there is a mistake in the writing of the sentence.