Excerpt from Federalist (if you need the passage)
Question 5 (3.75 points)
How does Hamilton use rhetoric in Paragraph 3 when addressing the importance of an independent judiciary?

Question 5 options:

By comparing and contrasting the courts of justice in the United States with those in nations without independent judiciaries, Hamilton makes a strong case for his position that the courts must be independent.

He uses an appeal to reason and logic, arguing that, since the judiciary's job is to make sure that laws follow the rules set out by the Constitution, the courts cannot be influenced by the branches that pass or enforce those laws.

He uses an appeal to emotion, arguing that a government with a judicial branch that is not independent will allow injustice and oppression to grow and liberty and freedom to wither and disappear.

He presents the judicial and legislative branches as opposites, asserting that the courts must be entirely independent because the legislature is entirely dependent on the executive branch.
Question 6 (3.75 points)
How does Hamilton convey his ideas about the power of the judicial branch of the government in Paragraph 1?
Question 6 options:

He depicts the powers of the executive and legislative branches in figurative terms—as controlling the sword and the purse, respectively—to stress that the judiciary is just as powerful as the other two.

He compares the powers of the executive and legislative branches to those of the judiciary, highlighting the strengths of the former and the relative weaknesses of the latter.

He focuses on what the judiciary has the power to do, irrespective of the powers held by the executive or legislative branches of government.

He asserts that the judiciary's central role is to oversee the "FORCE" and "WILL" imposed by the other two branches of government, thereby depicting the judiciary as the most powerful branch