subject
English, 31.01.2020 21:56 Jael2

In part iii of the statute, jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he then declares that infringing on the principles in the statute would violate natural law. why might jefferson have mentioned the revocability of human law? what does he gain by doing this? what might he lose?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
I’m cruel tribute which characters action most advance the development of the plot?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:50
What steps best a reader determine the central idea of a text? select three options.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:00
Who is generally considered a postmodern author
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:00
Throughout the giver, author lois lowry renames many everyday terms. eleven-year-olds are "elevens," babies are "newchildren," stuffed animals are "comfort objects," and families are called "family units." what is the purpose of these alternate labels? what effect do they have on the story?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In part iii of the statute, jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 18.01.2020 08:31
Questions on the website: 13722361