Please help, I'll appreciate it. Thank you!! Isaacson makes the argument that the pyramids at Giza serve as timeless instructors to the masses about the elements of great art. Do you find Isaacson’s argument about the qualities of the impact of the pyramids persuasive? Why or why not? Explain Isaacson’s argument, including the relationship between his claim, reasons, and evidence. Use your understanding of argument and claim to evaluate Isaacson’s text. Support your writing with evidence from the text.

(You don't need to add text evidence, I'll handle that)