Thinking about the Text >
1. Write a one-paragraph SUMMARY of Bernardin's review, being sure to identify
his criteria for evaluation and the extent to which he claims the movie did or did
not satisfy them.
2. Do you find Bernardin's TONE authoritative? Why or why not? How does
Bernardin establish his own AUTHORITY and CREDIBILITY or fail to do so?
Point to specific parts of the text to support your response.
3. What assumptions does Bernardin make about his AUDIENCE and the things they
are familiar with? How do you know? You might start by considering the
vocabulary he uses and the topics he mentions as he discusses the film.
4. How does Bernardin frame his review? In other words, how does the review open,
and how does Bernardin use this OPENING to make a crucial point about the
significant achievement of Black Panther?
5. Bernardin states that he has two main criteria for reviewing Black Panther: "what it
is” and “what it means." Think of a movie, book, television show, concert-
anything—that represents an important milestone, either for you personally or to
the larger culture it impacted. Write a REVIEW in which you evaluate not just
what this significant thing “is” but also what it “means." Be sure to state your
CRITERIA clearly and use EVIDENCE to support your claims.

mi hermana "sabe" bailar salsa. "conoces" tu el monumento la mitad del mundo? raul y yo sabemos al profesor de matematicas.

translated: my sister "knows" how to dance salsa. "do you know" the monument half of the world? raul and i "know" the math professor.

d.) then bernice winced as marjorie tossed her own hair over her shoulders and began to twist it slowly into two long blond braids until in her cream-colored negligée she looked like a delicate painting of some saxon princess. fascinated, bernice watched the braids grow. heavy and luxurious they were, moving under the supple fingers like restive snakes—and to bernice remained this relic and the curling iron and a to-morrow full of eyes.

"everyday

use" was written by alice walker. this is a story about two sisters, dee

and maggie wanting to have the handmade quilt. maggie wants to use the thing

for its purpose, while dee appreciates it for being “her heritage”.   the quilt represents family heritage. it was

believed that only dedication and years of hard work can represent a  quilt. 

mama decided to give

the quilts to her less fortunate daughter, maggie because she believed that dee

could not hold the true meaning of their family heritage and   that she would not use the quilts for their

purpose. however, dee believed that maggie can’t appreciate the quilts just as

how she sees them, and she thought that the quilt will be put to “everyday use”

by maggie and within 5 years or so, the quilt will turn into a rag. in the story, dee strongly believed that maggie do not deserve the quilts.

explanation:

have a great day!

hey u think u can me with a summary? ?