PLS HEL0 ASAP DUE TODAY AT 3 Answer the questions related to summary 1 and 2.

Summary 1: In the bottom of the ninth, Mudville trails. The last one outside go to Cooney, Burrows, and Casey. Mudville loses 4-2.
Summary 2: The poem "Casey at bat" by Earnest Lawrence Thayer is about a baseball hero named Casey who plays for the Mudville nine. At opening the game looks bad for Mudville. They are losing 4-2 in the bottom of the ninth. Then Conney and Burrows are both out first. If Casey gets to bat, he'll surely save the day; but Flynn and Blake go to bat first, and Neither is likely to score. But, look! Each player bags a hit, and the crowd goes wild with joy. With two men on up steps the mighty Casey. Strike one! The strike two! The crowd screams. Cast signals for silence. His smile turns to a frown; his anger signals his resolve. He"ll slam the ball out of the park. But the air is shattered by his swing. Somewhere men where laughing, the poet says. But there is no joy in Mudville - mighty Casey has struck out! " Casey at the bat" in a comic way reminds us that even the mighty can fall.

1. Summary 1 should be made stronger by doing all of the following except?
a. Conveying the main ideas more clearly.
b. adding some critical details.
c. conveying the author's underlying message.
d. using fewer details.

2. Which of the following critical details from the poem is included in both summaries?
a. Mudville losing in the bottom of the ninth.
b. Cooney and Burrows are out first.
c. Casey strikes out.
d. Even the mighty fall.

3. Which of the following sentences from summary 2 is not an important detail?
a. " They are losing 4-1 in the bottom of the ninth ".
b. "The Cooney and Burrows are both out first."
c. " The crowd goes wild with joy."
d. " Somewhere men are laughing."

4. Which passage in summary 2 should be put 8n quotation marks because it's a direct quote from the poem?
a." The game looks bad for Mudville."
b." He'll surely save the day."
c. " The crowd screams."
d. " Somewhere men are laughing."​

Memories of a memory have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? if so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. new insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things. first, memory is vague. imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. most likely, you could describe the room very generally. you could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. so when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. there are lots of different kinds of "tall." second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. for example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. in effect, your brain is combining memories to you tell the story. third, your memory changes over time. it also changes the more you retell the story. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. you may have noticed this yourself. the next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. you may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? the human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture. part a and part b below contain one fill-in-the-blank to be used for all three question responses. your complete response must be in the format a, b, c including the letter choice, commas, and a space after the commas. part a: which of the following best explains why memories from childhood are unreliable? fill in blank 1 using a, b, or c. our brains add details and general knowledge to childhood memories. our brains are not as reliable as video cameras are. our brains create new stories to make the past more interesting. part b select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using e, f, or g. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using h, i, or j. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture answer for blank 1:

Analyze how edgar allan poe's choice of setting in "the raven" to develop the speaker's character. be sure to use specific details from the poem to support your ideas.

Although alice walker published a number of essays, poetry collections, and stories during the 1970s, her third novel, the color purple, ) which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the national book award as well as the pulitzer prize (b) published in 1982, bringing her the widest acclaim by winning both the national book award and the pulitzer prize (c) published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim, winning both the national book award and the pulitzer prize (d) was published in 1982 and which, winning both the national book award and the pulitzer prize, brought her the widest acclaim (e) was published in 1982, winning both the national book award as well as the pulitzer prize, and bringing her the widest acclaim