Which sentence from the passage best supports the idea that growing monocultures can be risky? A. “American farmers grow wheat, soybeans, corn, and other foodstuffs, and it’s an
impressive sight.”
B. “Every cornstalk in the cornfield is exactly like its neighbors, with the same DNA.”
C. “If one cornstalk in the field can be killed easily by an attacker, so can all the rest.”
D. “One problem was that we didn’t have the science to know what had gone wrong; people didn’t know about DNA.”
E. “The cell can read DNA like a cookbook, finding recipes that tell how to make other molecules that it needs.”
F. “They look in gene banks for a strain of wheat that fights that pest well.”

i’m writing a memoir and i’ve been given the great suggestion of placing a ‘sub-narrative’ within some of the chapters – sort of, what was going on with me in the grand scheme of things.

i was wondering how to format this so that it is very obvious we are stepping out the of story.

firstly is a change in font from serif to sans workable? i also use dashes for a scene change. was thinking of using a different scene-changer too.

here’s a (shortened) example:

university – or what’s known as ‘uni’ in australia – were some of the best days of my life. where else do you get to potter around in a great location, have very little responsibility, learn lots of things, do lots of things and walk out four years later with a bonus – a degree!

with my university years i had immersed myself into community of intelligent ambitious people. generally everyone had a confidence about themselves. they knew where they were going in life and weren’t threatened by others.

—–

next normal paragraph continues here…

(sorry couldn’t show the fonts in this comment field)

too much?

it would be d because the however is more proper and the comma is placed in the right spot

xjcbxjbv bcxbvjdbjvbcjvjdvbvbdkc