PLEASE HELP AND PUT AN REASONING PLEASE

Why does the author follow up on the story of martin torres near the end of the article? what important ideas does this part of the article support?

Which detail is an example of internal conflict in “the monkeys paw”?

Which change should be made to improve this sentence? allen jumped in the puddle and his new shoes got wet and muddy.a)the new shoes got wet and muddy and allen jumps in the puddle.b)allen jumped in the puddle and got his new shoes wet and muddy.c)allen jumped in the puddle and gets his new shoes wet and muddy.d)the new shoes are getting wet and muddy and allen jumped in the puddle.