The writer is considering adding the following sentence after sentence 11. Focus groups are best understood as sources of potentially valuable information, not as the final word on consumer response.
Should the writer add this sentence?
A
Yes, because it introduces a counterargument to the claim made in sentence 11 that is rebutted in the rest of the paragraph.
B
Yes, because it provides commentary that connects the claim in sentence 11 with the evidence about focus groups provided in sentence 12.
с
No, because it interrupts the discussion of how focus groups provide information with unnecessary details about consumer response.
D
No, because it makes the argument of the passage less convincing by insisting that there is only one way to view focus groups.
E
No, because it includes a vague reference to valuable information without explaining the nature of this information.

B

Explanation:

Yes, because it provides commentary that connects the claim in sentence 11 with the evidence about focus groups provided in sentence 12

E

Explanation:

This is because it makes the most sense

honestly, school in itself just seems to be a huge waste of time. a lot of people graduate but still end up not doing anything in college anyways, which really makes the whole point of graduating seem useless. i'd rather not bring anyone's hopes up then. what i'd recommend is for whoever's reading this to simply drop out.

i mean, kanye did it. he said something along the lines of, "don't let society tell you what to do." now, he's obviously a very successful person, and since his album is called the college dropout i guess he never really had to go through all that nonsense in order to become a millionaire. the same goes for anyone else then.

the answer is academic paper

and the second should be college professor