subject
English, 24.02.2021 21:00 neirabrandon516

Read the passages below and complete the instructions that follow. Argument's conclusion: Governments should legally ban restaurants from offering toys as an incentive to families to buy food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium.
Counterargument: If the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of
sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium.
Rebuttal: Even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it's difficult to do so if
restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. Educating parents combined
with regulating restaurants can help families make healthier decisions.
Put the counterargument and rebuttal above into paragraph format. Add signal words to properly guide the reader.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
What is the roosevelt’s main purpose in this speech
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
Dogs make wonderful pets because they us stay happy and healthy. the topic sentence is "dogs make wonderful pets." , is this correct? i keep doubting myself.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:10
Read the passage from animal farm. as clover looked down the hillside her eyes filled with tears. if she could have spoken her thoughts, it would have been to say that this was not what they had aimed at when they had set themselves years ago to work for the overthrow of the human race. these scenes of terror and slaughter were not what they had looked forward to on that night when old major first stirred them to rebellion. if she herself had had any picture of the future, it had been of a society of animals set free from hunger and the whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity, the strong protecting the weak, as she had protected the lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of major's speech. instead—she did not know why—they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes. there was no thought of rebellion or disobedience in her mind. she knew that, even as things were, they were far better off than they had been in the days of jones, and that before all else it was needful to prevent the return of the human beings. whatever happened she would remain faithful, work hard, carry out the orders that were given to her, and accept the leadership of napoleon. but still, it was not for this that she and all the other animals had hoped and toiled. it was not for this that they had built the windmill and faced the bullets of jones's gun. such were her thoughts, though she lacked the words to express them. what was most likely orwell’s purpose for writing this passage? to show that clover is more sensitive to violence than the others to remind readers of major's speech and the original rebellion to present napoleon as a cruel leader unworthy of the animals’ support to represent misled followers and their dashed hopes for better lives
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
Read the passage from an argumentative essay. many endangered species are currently threatened by climate change. there are some laws already in place, but are they effective enough? anyone with a conscience knows that these creatures deserve the chance to survive without outside threats impeding their survival. i suppose this is a tough decision for lawmakers, but i hope they choose wisely. which statement best evaluates the claim in the passage?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read the passages below and complete the instructions that follow. Argument's conclusion: Governmen...
Questions
question
Arts, 17.11.2020 19:40
question
Computers and Technology, 17.11.2020 19:40
question
Medicine, 17.11.2020 19:40
question
Mathematics, 17.11.2020 19:40
Questions on the website: 13722363