What arguments are the authors of "The Last Wilderness Preserve" and "A New Land of Opportunity" making about how human behavior and actions impact Antarctica? Which author do you feel presents the stronger argument and why?

Answer and Explanation:

Both articles show that Antartica is a land little explored by humans. This is because in addition to providing an inhospitable environment, Antartica is protected by a worldwide agreement that prevents exploration, but allows for scientific research and observations. Both also show that even without being explored, human behavior has reached Antarctica due to the problems caused by global warming.

After reading the two texts, I believe that the arguments presented in "The Last Wilderness Preserve" are stronger, in approaching human greed as the main enemy of Antartica, capable of overriding any rule or agreement when necessary .

he correct answer is choice c. promoters of ufc events were eager to work with state athletic commissions, without public pressure being a necessary inducement.

try to do soaps tone.

s-subject

o-occasion (the reason the author wrote the poem)

a-audience (who is this poem mostly for)

p-purpose (was it to convince, inspire, etc. the audience)

s-speaker (can be the author or another character, like is a child, adult, woman, elderly, animal narrating the poem)

tone- the mood the reader gets from this poem

mood- the mood the author had with their own poem

meaning- what do you think the meaning is?

message- what is the author trying to explain to the audience? like what is the theme?

if you still don't get it try showing everyone the poem so they could unravel it