5 points 1. Is it ever right to use violent civil disobedience to change the world for
the better? Use evidence from at least 2 of the sources we've used in this
unit (Thoreau, MLK, Ghandi, Yousafzai articles or Malcolm X or MLK
videos) to support your argument in 4-5 sentences.

Answer and Explanation:

Thoreau claimed that it was fair to promote civil disobedience when the government promoted malefic laws that promoted the return of humanity. This concept was also defended by Martin Luther King, Malala, among other great thinkers who fight against unjust and harmful laws. We can confirm that the rejection of these types of laws and disobedience are essential to prevent those laws from continuing in a region. In this case, civil disobedience as a form of resistance to the denial of rights must be defended, but it must be defended, a time that the laws must attend to the will of the people.

the correct order is:

you're your own worst enemy:

they're going to say what they say, but

their opinions aren't holding you

back. it's your self-defeatist

attitude that's keeping your work

from getting its due.

i'd say the answer is nuisance. i hope i .