How does a coconut differ from an acorn? A. The acorns available in stores look different from the acorns that grow on trees, but the coconuts in stores look the same as coconuts on trees.
B. The acorn is related to both peaches and olives, but the coconut is only related to peaches.
C. The acorn's fruit walls do not open on their own, but pores in the coconut;'s fruit walls open on their own to release the seed.
D. The acorn's seed is protected by a hard covering called an endocarp, but the coconut's seed is not.

that's conceptually impossible.

if i wrote it, it wouldn't be a 'shakespeare' sonnet.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

the answer is definitely the first answer: lizabeth is older now and realizes that she may not have made the best decisions.