Analyze. In Act II, Scene 2, Juliet says, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose/ By any other name would smell as sweet" (lines 43-44). What does she mean? How does this comparison relate to one of the conflicts in her life?

Answer and Explanation:

Analyze. In Act II, Scene 2, Juliet says, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose/ By any other name would smell as sweet" (lines 43-44). What does she mean?

In Act II of "Romeo and Juliet", Juliet is questioning the value of a name. In her opinion, a name does not carry meaning in itself. As she explains, a rose would still be a rose, even if it had a different name. It wouldn't be less beautiful or fragrant if it had its name changed.

How does this comparison relate to one of the conflicts in her life?

This relates to a conflict in her life because of Romeo's and her own last names. She is a Capulet and he is a Montague, and the two families are enemies. Their names, therefore, mean a relationship between the two of them is forbidden. But Juliet is in love, which makes her question the feud and how important their family names should be in determining their fate.

his humanity shines from every page as he bears witness to the tragedy which befell the jewish race at the hands of the nazis. wiesel was a romanian-born jew whose home town of sighet was occupied by the hungarians for most of the second world war. in may 1944, all the jews in the area were forced into cattle wagons and transported to auschwitz.

because of all the immigration, america became one big melting pot. the diversity of cultures from all over the world made america somewhat divided as well. people that immigrated stayed with their kind, and their traditions, while native born americans stayed with their kind and their traditions. normally, people born in american scorned the immigrants as well. the new religions also divided america. in summary, it took away from the american culture and identified america as the "melting pot."