Choice Ashley had never felt insomnia until the day she saw her parents in the middle of an argument. The unwavering love between her parents was one of the few things in life that Ashley had taken for granted. She did not want to be like her friends who celebrated two Christmases and Thanksgivings. I will help out more in the kitchen, Ashley thought and resolved. "Maybe Dad needs help with work?" she asked herself. The idea of an internship in her father's law firm sounded appealing.
Ashley felt mature and happy with her potential role in the family. She had decided in the hours without sleep that she would do whatever it took to glue her parents together. Just when she thought her eyelids were getting heavy, she saw her parents enter her room.
"I thought you were awake, sweets," Diane said as she sat on her daughter's bed. "What's wrong?"
"Buttons, you oughta help us out here," Antonio let his loud voice echo in the silence of the night."Your mother and I can't decide about your major in college."
Ashley could not believe that the heated argument was about her. She tried to search in her father's eyes for a plausible alternative that would explain the earlier uproar. "That's what you guys were arguing about?" Ashley asked anyway.
"It takes a village to raise a child," Diane replied. "And two people are bound to disagree. Right, Mr. Lawyer? "
"Your microbiologist mother is right," Antonio agreed. "Besides, I have a strong vocal cord, buttons. I am loud."
Ashley found herself wondering about the choices her parents had considered for her. She ended up blurting, "Whatever makes both of you happy forever."
19
Select the correct answer.
A theme of this passage is family love. Which of these best supports the theme of the passage?
A.
" 'And two people are bound to disagree. Right, Mr. Lawyer? ' "
B.
" 'I have a strong vocal cord, buttons. I am loud. ' "
C.
"Just when she thought her eye lids were getting heavy. . ."
D.
". . . she would do whatever it took to glue her parents together."

The answer should be D

Explanation:

idkdk

explanation:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this