subject
English, 06.03.2021 01:00 hotsaucerman567

Should Cell Phone Use While Driving Be Banned? During your next car ride, pay attention to how many drivers you see talking on a cell phone. I guarantee that what you see will disturb you. An article in CQ Researcher states, "more than 111 million Americans use mobile phones—more than one-third of the population." These occupied drivers are increasing their risks of crashing at least six- to nine-fold. Numerous accidents have caused Americans to wonder, "Should talking on a cell phone while driving be banned?" In order to decrease the number of car accidents in America, people need to stop talking on their phones while driving.

According to Newsweek, collision rates for drivers using hand-held cell phones match the rates for impaired drivers. Holding a cell phone, having a conversation, steering a wheel, and concentrating on a road are too many tasks to juggle. A driver needs to fully concentrate on the road and prepare for obstacles such as pedestrians or sudden traffic. In 2016, a motorist talking on a cell phone ran through a red light into a busy intersection. Her mistake forced a dump truck to swerve and topple over into traffic, causing a 10-car pileup. A study conducted by the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society found that "cell phone distraction causes more than 330,000 injuries in the United States every year." If only those drivers had parked or waited to make those calls, thousands of people would have avoided a dangerous situation like the dump truck incident. In order to help eliminate these accidents, laws need to be enacted and enforced.

Handling a cell phone while driving has proven to be increasingly dangerous, yet people continue to do it. The government needs to get involved. The fear of receiving an outrageous fine will force people to stop talking on a cell phone while driving. "If the government sees the need to make more stringent efforts and issue more tickets [for distracted cell phone driving], we will. We did it for seatbelts, and no one thought it was important. But it saved lives," says Brian Walsh, a police official. Concentrating on the road is just as important as wearing a seatbelt. More Americans are realizing this important fact. Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia have already banned cell phone use while driving. The rest of the country, however, still needs convincing. Some foolish people still oppose these laws.

Jim Wolf believes that if the government bans talking on a cell phone while driving, they should ban changing radio stations, drinking a soda, and eating while driving as well. "Distraction is a serious concern, but I don't think it's substantially changed because of the cell phone," comments Jim. The research of Dr. David Strayer, a professor at the University of Utah, proves Jim wrong. According to him, "carrying on a conversation requires much more attention than passively listening to the radio or sipping a soda." It is a far more interactive activity and takes a lot more time. In Michigan alone, cellular phones contributed to 879 accidents in 2003; this proves that cell phones are a substantially great distraction on the road.

Banning cell phone use while driving will save lives and reduce the number of accidents in this country. That is what matters. Australia, China, Kenya, Russia, and many other countries have already realized this. When will America?
22
From the article, it appears that the author believes that
A.
banning cell phone use while driving will not affect the number of car accidents in America.
B.
banning cell phone use while driving will prevent a number of car accidents in America.
C.
banning cell phone use while driving will decrease the number of cell phones sold in America.
D.
banning cell phone use while driving will increase the number car accidents in America.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
In the reading, statement on the assassination of martin luther king, jr., which of the following inferences is best supported by the second paragraph? martin luther king dedicated his life to love and to justice between fellow human beings. he died in the cause of that effort. in this difficult day, in this difficult time for the united states, it’s perhaps well to ask what kind of a nation we are and what direction we want to move in. for those of you who are black—considering the evidence evidently is that there were white people who were responsible—you can be filled with bitterness, and with hatred, and a desire for revenge. question 5 options: a) the speaker is urging the same non-violent response that was preached by the slain martin luther king, jr. b) the speaker doesn’t want people to be angry about the death of martin luther king, jr. c) the speaker is trying to encourage racial resentment. d) the speaker wishes he hadn’t been born an american citizen.
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 16:30
Which statement best explains why shakespeare has cassius use the word fawn rather than a synonym such as flatter to describe his actions?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
Tia and lin had been best friends since kindergarten. both avid soccer players, the girls decided to try out for the high school team together. unfortunately, there was just one open spot, so only one of the girls would be chosen. they both worked hard, and on tryout day, they did their best. when the team roster came out, lin was excited to see that she had made the team but sad that tia had not. tia was happy for her friend and vowed to work harder so she would make the team the next year. which sentence is the exposition of the passage
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
*ill give best answer brainliest*read the excerpt below and answer the question. we did not know, as yet, which was the better side, right or left, which road led to prison and which to the crematoria. still, i was happy, i was near my father. our procession continued slowly to move forward. another inmate came over to us: “satisfied? ” “yes,” someone answered. “poor devils, you are heading for the crematorium.” he seemed to be telling the truth. not far from us, flames, huge flames, were rising from a ditch. something was being burned there. a truck drew close and unloaded its hold: small children. babies! yes, i did see this, with my own eyes . . children thrown into the flames. (is it any wonder that ever since then, sleep tends to elude me? ) so that was where we were going. a little farther on, there was another, larger pit for adults. what is the conflict portrayed in this excerpt from elie wiesel’s night? select all that apply. the external conflict between the nazis and the jews the external conflict between the nazis and the allies the external conflict between wiesel and the inmate the internal conflict between wiesel’s memory of the burning bodies and his desire for peaceful sleep
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Should Cell Phone Use While Driving Be Banned? During your next car ride, pay attention to how many...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363