What is one way in which black argues against the majority opinion?
a. he argues that the court has not protected teachers and students rights for 50 years.
b. he argues that the students also fasted for two days in protest
c. he argues that all of the students who protested were not suspended.
d. he argues that the students parents forced them to be disruptive.

A. He argues that the court has not protected the teachers and students rights for 50 Years.

Explanation:

The Blacks were battling for their rights that prove to be against the majority as until now their rights were being crushed by the brutality of laws that favored the whites and discriminated against the Asian-Americans. Thus, they argue the court that it failed to protect the rights of black students and teachers and deprived them of their basic interests for 50 long years. They had a long struggle to battle for their rights, despite their representation being so strong. The passage emphasizes this claim and interrogates the failure of court in providing equality and protection of their rights.

after the moon goes from a full moon it turns into a waning gibbous moon.

here's where my answer came from. i hope this .

the answer to the given question above would the one that wiesel is establishing and how is ethos by appeal to his authority in having survived the holocaust. hope this answers your question.

have a great day ahead!