Which of the following statements best summarizes the author's views A president's potential danger is limited because he can serve only a limited number of terms. A president's potential danger is limited because he can serve only a limited number of terms. People are protected from a dangerous president by elections every four years and a process the legislature can undertake. People are protected from a dangerous president by elections every four years and a process the legislature can undertake. An impeached president is forcibly removed from office. An impeached president is forcibly removed from office. Congress can imprison the president as any other citizen for crimes.

B. People are protected from a dangerous president by elections every four years and a process the legislature can undertake.

Explanation:

The author's views about this is that that there would always be election every four years, even if the president is dangerous to the people , he can be removed through voting during election process and also process can be undertaken by legislature too. Hence, president's potential danger is limited

beginner

government is strong when they have the ability to persuade those they govern to believe government has enough power to force them or should be forcing them to do government’s will.

when enough of the citizenry do not believe government can force them or should force them to do its bidding, government has lost or will lose its strength and power to coerce.

when enough of the citizenry do believe government can force or should force them to do its bidding, they become passive at the least or actively pro-government and repeat government’s own rhetoric to pass on what they have been persuaded by government’s propaganda.

a true majority isn’t always needed to govern or to stop government. many times all that is needed is a strong minority. if a determined 30% of the population rises up against government in a concerted effort to bring it down, this size minority usually will succeed as long as those actively opposing the minority are less in force than the minority. so if 41% of the population sits at home watching tv rooting for one side or the other, they don’t matter. it’s the active parties who make a difference.

there purpose is to entertain