Match each claim on the left to its counterclaim on the right True brotherhood is respecting the

separateness of others.

States cannot disobey federal laws

against segregation.

States have the right to maintain racial

segregation

Involuntary segregation does not

respect the rights of individuals.

Segregation allows for separate but

equal status of people.

People cannot be equal if they are

separated in public places

Claim - True brotherhood is respecting the  separateness of others.

Counterclaim - Involuntary segregation does not  respect the rights of individuals.

Claim - States have the right to maintain the racial  segregation.

Counterclaim - States cannot disobey federal laws  against segregation.

Claim - Segregation allows for separate but  equal status of people.

Counterclaim - People cannot be equal if they are  separated in public places.

Explanation:

A Claim is characterized as a statement of something that an individual believes to be the truth. Such a statement is required to be substantiated with adequate evidence in order to verify it. While a counterclaim aims to refute or neglect the prior claim. For instance; the first claim displays that actual brotherhood is all about honoring each other's differences while the counterclaim rebuts it by stating that the individual separation doesn't allow this respect of individual rights. Thus, the given claims have correctly been matched with their counterclaims as mentioned above.  

The first Mach is A to C

The second match is B to A

The third match is C to B

Explanation:

I hope this made some sense

Also I hope I helped

hey there!

the reasoning behind university’s having students create prompts is to mainly get to know the person better. they want to know their interests, goals, personality,

it’s also a good way for the university to see the persons focuses in life. for example, if someone’s room is very organized and clean, usually all aspects of their life are the same.

so really, having people prompting to apply to a university is so the college can get more information about that person.

hope this you! if you need any more details, i’d be happy to

- nicole

1. drag the central argument paine presents and its two claims to complete the chart. argument claims america may have flourished more had it not been under the power of any european country. america may have flourished under britain in the past, but there is no guarantee that it will continue to flourish in the future. america will continue to flourish as long as the essential food products it sells are bought and eaten in europe. the american colonies will no longer flourish when britain makes war against them. britain's king has shown himself to be prejudiced against the colonies, rather than wanting them to flourish.

2.select the sentence in this passage that can be classified as a false statement.

although few humans per year are attacked by polar bears, any individual attack can be terrifying and even fatal. the warming of arctic regions has allowed the intrusion of humans into the polar bears’ habitat, increasing the danger of harmful contacts. remaining alert and using precautions can humans avoid a negative encounter with a polar bear. traveling together and staying close to the group can humans avoid bear attacks. certain weapons, including nonlethal ones such as pepper spray, are effective against polar bears. once a bear has decided to attack, however, nothing can be done.

3.select the sentence in this passage that demonstrates the fallacy of making an extreme either-or claim.

the civil war was the bloodiest conflict in the history of the united states. more than 600,000 soldiers lost their lives. the fighting took place in many different cities and throughout the countryside. the wounded often suffered acute pain while in the field hospitals. they all should have asked for better care. william hammond, the surgeon general of the union army, created a new system of sanitary field care. if people do not accept hammond as the most important person from the civil war, they have no understanding of the war.