Read the introduction from a student’s rhetorical analysis essay. In the 2020 article "To Educate Good Citizens, We Need More Than the ‘New’ Civics” in Forbes Magazine, Senior Editor Natalie Wexler acknowledges the need for a new concept of civics education. She argues that most attempts to improve civics in schools are too general or political. She believes that people need to "rethink basic assumptions about teaching and learning.” She juxtaposes "action civics” and journalism that involve students in their communities.

The addition of which sentence would strengthen this introduction?

a. One of Wexler’s points is that students fail to engage with civics because it is “traditionally conceived as boring.”
b. Wexler uses facts and reasoning to present an effective argument that civics instruction needs reform.
c. Wexler’s comments about “action civics” can be politically controversial and unrealistic.
d. Wexler is the author of The Knowledge Gap: The Hidden Cause of America's Broken Education System—and How to Fix It.

author – information on the internet with a listed author is one indication of a credible site. the fact that the author is willing to stand behind the information presented (and in some cases, include his or her contact information) is a good indication that the information is reliable.

date – the date of any research information is important, including information found on the internet. by including a date, the website allows readers to make decisions about whether that information is recent enough for their purposes.

sources – credible websites, like books and scholarly articles, should cite the source of the information presented.

domain – some domains such as .com, .org, and .net can be purchased and used by any individual. however, the domain .edu is reserved for colleges and universities, while .gov denotes a government website. these two are usually credible sources for information (though occasionally a university will assign a .edu address to each of its students for personal use, in which case use caution when citing). be careful with the domain .org, because .org is usually used by non-profit organizations which may have an agenda of persuasion rather than education.

site design – this can be very subjective, but a well-designed site can be an indication of more reliable information. good design make information more easily accessible.

writing style – poor spelling and grammar are an indication that the site may not be credible. in an effort to make the information presented easy to understand, credible sites watch writing style closely.

can you elaborate on what the question asks?

hmm, sadly there is no dialogue. there is no place in the story where he is talking to anyone. it's more of just describing what he eats and where he sleeps. you have to become anne frank, give details of where you are, what other folks look like, how the environment is. have a little bit of dialogue tell of what people are specifically saying. anne frank talked about her entire household including the people, the objects, the lighting, the food they ate, and even the smell in the air. there has to be more to your diary entries, the whole story in its current state is only about peter van daan, the food, the sounds, and where he sleeps. also he seems to be writing only once a year yet more than that happened from day to day. for a friend, i can you write it out, if you want.

an great real life example for the lottery principle is the real life lottery itself. it adheres to the lottery principle so much it's even called lottery. you apply for the lottery in the manner of getting a ticket and if you are lucky, the goods are distributed to you, in this case, the huge amounts of money. there are other real life example but this is the best one.