English, 31.03.2021 23:10 WonTonBagel

Paragraph to be revised: Essay claim: Laws requiring people to show photo identification
in order to vote decrease voter participation.
Lots of people don't have photo identification. Requiring people
to show photo identification to vote would keep those without
this type of identification from voting. Those who often don't
have identification include elderly individuals who no longer drive
and citizens living in high poverty areas where transportation is
limited. They would be denied the chance to vote. Sociologist
Mark Abernathy writes, "requiring photo identification in order to
vote essentially eliminates a whole population of American
voters. These voters are part of society, but they are denied a
basic right guaranteed to all Americans over the age of eighteen.
Elections are then determined by only a portion of the population,
not the entire population" (page 820 of the article "Photo
Identification Disenfranchisement"). Some people think this is
just not true. Ria Olberson, an economist at Alabaster University,
states, "few Americans are without drivers' licenses. Even if the
license is expired or revoked, it still counts as photo
identification. To claim that requiring identification
disenfranchises a segment of the American population is simply
inaccurate" (page 101). Olberson is just wrong! A lot of people

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 23:30

What does moon shadow think about where the tang people live (text evidence)

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 02:00

Match the academic requirements with the careers. technical program bachelor's degree high school diploma equal opportunity officer arrowright court reporter arrowright security officer arrowright

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 06:00

In the real world, feldman learned to settle for less than 95 percent. he came to consider a company “honest” if its payment rate was above 90 percent. he considered a rate between 80 and 90 percent “annoying but tolerable.” if a company habitually paid below 80 percent, feldman might post a hectoring note, like this one: the cost of bagels has gone up dramatically since the beginning of the year. unfortunately, the number of bagels that disappear without being paid for has also gone up. don’t let that continue. i don’t imagine that you would teach your children to cheat, so why do it yourselves? the excerpt serves as which type of support for the authors’ argument? a claim an example a conclusion a counterclaim

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 09:30

These two sentences have one difference: one has a comma. think about what each sentence means. 1. let's eat, grandma. 2. let's eat grandma. what does the first sentence mean? what does the second sentence mean?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Paragraph to be revised: Essay claim: Laws requiring people to show photo identification
in o...

Questions