According to "Watching the World from the Riverbank," what does setting help to enhance in a story?

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

What makes the literal, word-for-word translation of the metamorphosis hard to read?

Plz which of the following is true about third-person limited point of view? it uses the word i, and one character tells the story. it uses the word you and makes the reader feel a part of the story. the narrator is not part of the story and only states the characters' actions and speech. the narrator is not part of the story but knows what one character is thinking and feeling.