John ruskin in his essay "work," claims that doctors value curing the sick more than money, and offers the following reason in support of his claim.
[doctors] in the whole, desire to cure the sick; and-if they are good doctors, and the choice were fairly put to them- would rather cure their patient and lose their fee than kill him and get it.
which best evaluates the support ruskin offers for his claim?
a. it is not logical; the author ignores other possibilities-that the patient is cured and the doctor still gets his fee, for example.
b. it is not logical; the aurthor himself is not a doctor, so he does not have the expertise necessary to qualify his opinion.
c. it is logical; most people don't want to become doctors just for the sake i money