Which of the following best describes the miranda v. arizona case and its significance?
miranda v. arizona was about being wrongly identified by an accuser. the case create a rule that more than an accuser's identification was needed for an arrest.
miranda v. arizona was about confessing without an attorney present. the case create a rule that an attorney must be present for suspects being questioned by police.
miranda v. arizona was about protecting a person's 5th and 6th amendment rights. the ruling gave police the burden of reminding citizens of their rights when arrested.
miranda v. arizona was about a signed confession obtained by conspiracy between police and miranda's attorney. the judge ruled that attorneys must be self or court appointed.

Excerpt from the rainbow, chapter x (excerpt) d. h. lawrence then there was an outcry. mrs. brangwen would not have it; no, she would not. all her innate dignity and standoffishness rose up. then there was the vicar lecturing the school. "it was a sad thing that the boys of cossethay could not behave more like gentlemen to the girls of cossethay. indeed, what kind of boy was it that should set upon a girl, and kick her, and beat her, and tear her pinafore? that boy deserved severe castigation, and the name of coward, for no boy who was not a coward—etc., etc." from the textual evidence provided in this paragraph, what conclusions can the reader draw regarding the vicar? a) he favors boys over girls. b) he has no strong feelings. c) he supports mrs. brangwen's perspective entirely. d) he tends to be indulgent towards children's misbehavior.