Which is true about evaluating texts?
comparing two texts does not require a detailed analysis of either text.
a venn diagram can be used to find similarities and differences between texts that share similar, as well as differing, perspectives.
short quotes, summaries, and paraphrases should be avoided in any analysis of multiple authors’ perspectives.
evaluating an author’s perspective primarily involves making up your own mind about the topic the author discusses.

The correct answer is B. A Venn diagram can be used to find similarities and differences between texts that share similar, as well as differing, perspectives.

Explanation:

Evaluating texts often implies fist analyzing one or multiple texts to create a judgment about them which is supported using arguments, quotes, paraphrasing, etc. Additionally, in the case of working with more than one text or material, it is necessary to compare and contrast them usually by analyzing the features of each text or material and then pointing out similarities and differences.

In evaluation, this can be achieved by using different strategies including a Veen diagram, which is a type of diagram in which you can include features that are unique to each text (differences) and those shared by the texts (commonalities). Thus, the true statement about evaluating texts is "Venn diagram can be used to find similarities and differences between texts that share similar, as well as differing, perspectives".

yes its b

explanation:

to tese

a omg *hides wit stranger*