There have been many film adaptations of mary shelley's novel frankenstein. how do most film adaptations differ from the original text version of the story?
a. they make the story more exciting by only giving victor’s version.
b. they create more sympathy for the creature by giving him a back story.
c. they create less sympathy for the creature by making him a mindless beast.
d. they are less complex because they lack the multiple perspectives of the novel.

i don't see any questions on your profile, currently, but i'd be happy to try and with any problems that you have, so long as i understand the problem myself.

i think that will have something to do with the mississippi river but google will know the full answer for sure

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."