What is revealed about brutus’ character and motivations in the moral dilemma presented in his act 2.1 soliloquy?

The answer is...

Brutus’ act 2.1 soliloquy reveals the flawed reasoning that he’s using to defend the assassination plot. He assumes that Caesar’s growing power will result in forming a tyrant, but Brutus already considers Caesar a tyrant. He is struggling to find just cause or at least an honorable reason to undertake such a heinous act. He concludes that it is for the good of Rome.

I just took the test.

write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrators’ schools and explain how their schools shape their perspectives toward the hijab. cite evidence from the text to support your ideas.

copy and paste answer:

two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrator's schools would be this, the one school with the veil is the one school were the students were forced to wear the veils, and they did not know why they had to wear the veils. the girl student writing the story was not like the other students, she didn't care. in the second school there was a lot of hostile activities going on throughout the school. most of the students were upset and this, including the author, but she was trying to look and the good side of things.  

overall, both schools had something that the students or most of the students did not like or appreciate. what you can learn from these stories is that life will never be exactly how you may want it to be. complaining about your lifestyle will only make matters worse or at least feel worse in the long run. that's happens to be the information you can interpret from these two stories.

well for some you have to do on your own on a paper but yeah