Which of the following does not explain how literature and art can be connected?
a poem and a painting can evoke the same mood.
a poem and a painting can display the same images.
a poem and a painting can be on the same subject.
a poem and painting are exactly the same and have no differences

I would say the last one doesn't make any sense, because it attempts to blur the lines between what makes something art, versus it being literature. Instead of connecting the two through theme or emotion, it attempts to make the generalization that they are exactly the same. Also, this option is kind of like the black sheep in comparison to the other answers, as the others all delve into the subject matter, and this one gives no reasoning. If one of the other's are wrong, then that would pretty much mean that they are all wrong, which wouldn't make much sense.