Asap plzz fast
read the passage.

excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014

this is a common-sense proposal—no discrimination, no retaliation when women ask how much the guys are getting paid, and basic data that tell us how much men and women are getting paid for key jobs. basic protection, basic information—that's essentially all this bill does. employers can still pay different workers different salaries based on factors like skill, performance, expertise, seniority, and so forth—the paycheck fairness act doesn't touch any of that.
does the speaker provide sufficient, valid evidence to support her claim that the paycheck fairness act is, indeed, fair?

a. yes, because she lists reasons why differences in pay based on seniority and job type are reasonable in nearly every industry.

b. yes, because she specifies several ways in which the act will end discrimination while preserving justified differences in pay.

c. no, because she does not go into detail about the provisions of the act.

d. no, because despite everything, she admits that some differences in pay will still exist.