subject
English, 22.10.2019 19:10 mv603177

50 take your time don't guess i have no problem giving out points

read the opinions below. how do these two opinions differ?

source a

the united states constitution will provide a strong central governing power to rule the united states and make it capable of withstanding european nations. without a constitution, britain can easily overtake the united states, or individual states could grow so strong that they might try to overtake the new nation. it is vital that we have a constitution that sets up a strong central government if we want the united states to last.

source b

if the united states constitution creates a strong central government, the individual states will lose their governing power. the country will practically become a monarchy, with a federal government holding all of the power. we need to create a balanced system, not with a strong central government, but rather with ruling bodies divided by states. there is no need to ratify a united states constitution that will simply create another monarchy.

a. source a presents a point of view against a monarchy. source b presents a point of view in favor of the constitution.
b. source a presents a point of view in favor of a weak federal government. source b presents a point of view in favor of a strong federal government.
c. source a presents a point of view in favor of a strong federal government. source b presents a point of view in favor of the constitution.
d. source a presents a point of view in favor of the constitution. source b presents a point of view against the constitution.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:30
Read the excerpt. … in lower burma, i was hated by large numbers of people. … i was subdivisional police officer of the town, and … anti-european feeling was very bitter. … as a police officer i was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. … i had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing. … i was all for the burmese and all against their oppressors, the british. what is the situational irony in the excerpt from “shooting an elephant” by george orwell? the narrator is a british police officer and part of the system he dislikes. the narrator is himself a well-liked member of the burmese government. the narrator has recently become a burmese citizen. the narrator has decided to leave the british empire.
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 19:00
Which of the following facts is true for the jallianwalla massacre, as discussed in gandhi's reponse to mr. pennington? a) all members gathered for the vaisakhi fair remained calm. b) general dyer made a verbal proclamation warning all members of the crowd to stay peaceful. c) children attending the vaisakhi fair were killed, d) anyone who tried to run away from the violence was able to escape.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:00
The line “violently shuddered—with the fright of it” could be categorized as a(n) and a anaphora; sensory appeal sensory appeal; image paradox; anaphora personification; image
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Namerican born chinese, the main characters, the monkey king, danny, and jin wang have conflict because they:
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
50 take your time don't guess i have no problem giving out points

read the opinions b...
Questions
question
History, 22.08.2020 01:01
question
World Languages, 22.08.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722367