Explain how levitt and dubner’s argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality. address how well reasoning and evidence are used.

their claim about cheating existing in high-incentive situations

the facts they present about sumo and the bagel business

their use of statistical evidence

their use of different examples (sumo and bagels) in their evidence

their overall use of inductive reasoning to arrive at a generalization about morality

what are the lines. come on!

do your own work !