Read these excerpts from the way to rainy mountain by n. scott momaday:

you know, everything had to begin, and this is how it was: the kiowas came one by one into the world through a hollow log. they were many more than now, but not all of them got out.
they called themselves kwuda and later tepda, both of which mean “coming out.” and later still they took the name gaigwu, a name which can be taken to indicate something of which the two halves differ from each other in appearance.

which sentence best explains how the historical description of the subject matter enhances the meaning of the mythical description?

a. it makes the myth more memorable by using imagery to achieve a reflective tone.
b. it clarifies the myth by explaining what coming into the world through a hollow log actually meant.
c. it supports the myth by providing facts about how the kiowas first named themselves with words that mean “coming out.”
d. it expands on the myth by describing the beginning of the kiowa tribe from the first-person point of view.

How can we make the world a better place, specifically towards discriminated people (lgbtq+ community, people of color, people with disabilities etc.) how can we make them change their view on people they call "different"? how can we get people to love one another despite how they look or who they love or where they are from? 2-3 paragraphs ! (ᵔᴥᵔ)

“tell me o swan, your ancient tale” by kabir “the swan” by rilke “spanish dancer” by rilke “your laughter” by pablo neruda “birthplace” by shaffarzadeh “it’s this way” by nazim hikmet “counting small-boned bodies” by robert bly choose two poems that you would like to write about. analyze each poem. study the perspective, or point of view, of the speaker in each of the two poems that you select for this assignment. consider these questions: who is the speaker in each of these poems? what is the speaker’s tone? is there a conflict? is there a message? what does each of the poems have in common? what is different about each of the poems? which literary devices are used in the poems? are these literary devices found in both of the poems? what does the speaker hope to achieve in each of the poems? how are these achievements/goals been met? directions: using the two poems of your choosing, write a clear, concise, two hundred and fifty word essay that compares and contrasts the two poems. make sure you include at least two of the following to support your thesis: tone, point of view, literary devices, and meter.

Someone get back to me , i really don’t get this