Aline of reasoning that presents the opposite side of the author’s argument is called a

the correct answer should be a counterargument. The opposite side would be whatever the opposing, or countering, argument is. For example, if someone is in support of free college, they would support their argument and perhaps include some information about the counterargument, which would be not supporting free college. Hope this helps.

The answer to the statement: A line of reasoning that presents the opposite side of the author´s argument, is called a... would be: counterclaim, or counter argument.

Explanation:

In academic writing, one the most important things is to ensure that a thesis, or argument, is objective and valid, and this objectivity and validity is precisely given when the author does not just choose a correct argument that can be verifiable through research, but also shows the possible viewpoints that might arise as a counterpoint to the main argument. This counter argument, counterclaim, thus, is the way in which a writer of an academic essay displays his knowledge and research on a matter, and shows how he understands that his own claim, no matter how correct, can have counterpoints, or arguments against it, that will be the challenge for the writer, as he needs to not just prove his argument, but also disprove the counterclaims.

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.