Sherman alexie wrote the book in order to advocate for native americans’ rights. he did a great job! what is missing from the interpretation? no evidence is present to defend the interpretation. it isn’t the correct interpretation, which is discussed in the lecture. it is missing the other two purposes or reasons alexie wrote the book. sherman alexie never stated why he wrote the book.

No evidence is present to defend the interpretation.

A. No evidence is present to defend the interpretation.

dramatic irony occurs when the reader/audience knows more about a character's situation than the character does. the one main effect is that it gives the reader a sense of superiority, or detached superiority. the reader not only seemingly discovers what is revealed, but feels superior for doing so.

type of error:

the error in the sentence is a "dangling modifier". a dangling modifier is a phrase, word or clause that "dangles" because there is not target to modify. in this case, "after mopping the floor" is the dangling modifier since it has no word to modify. the noun "house" cannot mop the floor; therefore there is a mistake in the writing of the sentence.