Read this argument from the New York Times opinion pages.. Does the author of this article agree or disagree with Nadia arumugam? Use evidence from each article to support your answer

i believe it would be the first one the importance of internet safety

explanation:

because now and days kids don't know what the can find on the internet they can find dark web, 4 chan ect. if we don't teach them internet safety anything can happen.

(don't search up,dark web,4 chan u have been warned)

life will not be easy it will be filled with war, lack of resources, damaged planet, and lack of land to live on.

i imagine life will be easier in the sense that we will have better technology and better health and medical advances as well as infustructure growth and economic resilliance we will have much stronger militaries and probably be constintly fighting with other countries for resources and lang that is actually cleanenough to live or farm on . as well i think the need for fresh water will only brainliest answer lol

in   ¨and yet the books¨   by czelaw miloz the tone is positive since it tells us that when we touch a book, it starts to live and the perspective is in the third person and turns once into the first person. in "the rhinoceros" by eugene ionesco the tone is illogical and absurd   and the perspective is in the third person since it is a play.