There are many people in the world already projecting that the lack of water will reach a very critical level in not a so distant future. Do you agree with them why or why not?

i dont know what you want me to answer

what is the question here?

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

im not entirely sure what you're asking.